| Heat Exchanger Type | Plate, rotary wheel, heat pipe, or run-around coil | Choose according to allowable cross-contamination, installation space, and maintenance requirements | Plate units have no moving parts; rotary units generally provide high recovery with a compact footprint; heat pipes require suitable orientation; run-around coils allow separated air streams. |
| Heat Recovery Performance | Sensible effectiveness commonly about 50%–85%, depending on design and operating conditions | Ventilation systems, process exhaust recovery, and energy-efficient air handling | Compare products at the same airflow, entering temperatures, humidity conditions, face velocity, and pressure drop. Effectiveness alone does not determine total operating cost. |
| Primary Heat-Transfer Material | Aluminum; stainless steel; coated or galvanized steel | Material choice should match humidity, contaminants, temperature, and cleaning method | Aluminum offers low weight and good thermal conductivity. Stainless steel is preferable for corrosive, hygienic, or high-temperature service. Coated or galvanized steel may suit less aggressive environments. |
| Corrosion Exposure | Low, moderate, coastal, chemical, or high-humidity environment | Industrial exhaust, marine locations, wastewater areas, kitchens, and humid climates | Specify corrosion-resistant surfaces, suitable coatings, drainable geometry, and inspection access. Confirm compatibility with chlorides, acids, solvents, and cleaning chemicals. |
| Airflow Capacity | Determine from required ventilation or process airflow, typically expressed in m³/h or CFM | All air-to-air heat exchanger applications | Select the exchanger for the actual design airflow and include reasonable allowance for filter loading, fouling, altitude, and future capacity needs. |
| Face Velocity | Approximately 1.5–3.0 m/s for many ventilation applications | General ventilation where balanced efficiency, size, noise, and pressure drop are required | Lower velocity usually reduces pressure drop and noise but increases core size. Higher velocity can reduce equipment size while increasing pressure drop and potential carryover. |
| Core Face Area | Face area = Airflow ÷ (3600 × Face velocity), when airflow is in m³/h | Preliminary sizing of the heat exchanger face | Example: 5,000 m³/h at 2.5 m/s requires approximately 0.56 m² of face area before considering casing, bypass, and service clearances. |
| Illustrative Core Dimensions | 1,000 m³/h: about 0.11 m²; 5,000 m³/h: about 0.56 m²; 10,000 m³/h: about 1.11 m² at 2.5 m/s | Early-stage layout and equipment-room planning | These are calculated face areas, not final product dimensions. Confirm core width, height, depth, casing, access panels, filters, dampers, and duct transitions with the final selection. |
| Core Depth | Commonly selected in the approximate range of 200–600 mm, depending on construction | Applications requiring a balance between effectiveness and available installation depth | Greater depth can increase heat-transfer area and effectiveness, but may also increase pressure drop, weight, cost, and cleaning difficulty. |
| Fin or Plate Spacing | Approximately 2–6 mm for many compact air-side designs | Spacing should reflect air cleanliness, moisture, and fouling risk | Tighter spacing provides more heat-transfer surface but is more sensitive to dust and blockage. Wider spacing improves cleanability and is better for dirty or lint-laden air. |
| Pressure Drop | Often designed within approximately 100–300 Pa per air stream, subject to the system design | Energy-conscious HVAC and ventilation systems | Use the manufacturer’s certified performance data. A lower initial purchase price may result in higher fan energy costs if the exchanger has excessive resistance. |
| Air Leakage and Cross-Contamination | Low-leakage plate design, purge-sector rotary design, or separated-loop configuration | Hospitals, laboratories, kitchens, toilets, and contaminant-sensitive processes | Avoid direct air-to-air transfer when exhaust contaminants cannot be tolerated. Specify sealing quality, pressure relationships, purge arrangements, and leakage limits. |
| Condensation and Frost Control | Drain pan, condensate connection, bypass, preheat, defrost cycle, or frost-resistant control strategy | Cold climates and systems with humid exhaust air | Check dew-point and frost conditions at the coldest design temperature. Provide drainage and access for cleaning where condensation is expected. |
| Temperature Range | Select according to minimum and maximum entering-air temperatures and any process temperature peaks | Commercial ventilation, industrial exhaust, and heat-recovery systems | Verify material limits, seal compatibility, coating temperature rating, thermal expansion, and any fire or smoke requirements. |
| Configuration | Counterflow, crossflow, or cross-counterflow | Configuration should match required effectiveness and available duct arrangement | Counterflow generally offers high thermal effectiveness. Crossflow is often easier to integrate into compact equipment. Cross-counterflow provides a compromise between performance and layout flexibility. |
| Maintenance and Cleaning | Removable core, inspection doors, washable surfaces, drain access, and replaceable seals | Dusty, greasy, humid, or hygiene-controlled environments | Allow enough clearance for inspection and removal. Include upstream filtration and select spacing that will not clog under the expected contaminant load. |
| Final Verification Data | Airflow, entering temperatures, humidity, effectiveness, pressure drop, leakage, sound, dimensions, and weight | Final equipment specification and procurement | Do not finalize the selection from nominal airflow alone. Confirm certified performance at the exact operating point and verify compliance with applicable local codes and project requirements. |