| Typical location | Installed against a wall or at the edge of a pick module | Installed as a central rack, with carton flow lanes facing both sides | Use single-sided runs where wall space is available; use double-sided runs to create denser central pick modules. |
| Recommended manual aisle width | Approximately 900–1,200 mm | Approximately 1,200–1,500 mm between opposing pick faces | Confirm the final width using worker movement, tote dimensions, order volume, and local safety requirements. |
| Aisle width with carts or order-picking equipment | Usually about 1,200–1,800 mm, depending on cart size and turning method | Usually about 1,500–2,100 mm where carts pass or operators work simultaneously | Use the equipment manufacturer's turning and clearance requirements rather than selecting an aisle width by rack type alone. |
| Pick-face access | Access is available from one operating side | Access is available from two operating sides | Double-sided layouts can separate product families or order flows by facing without adding another rack row. |
| Approximate pick-face density per rack footprint | Baseline: 1.0 usable pick face per rack position | Up to approximately 2.0 usable pick faces per rack position when both sides are fully utilized | Double-sided racks can increase SKU access density, but the wider shared aisle reduces part of the space benefit. |
| Suitable pick density | Low to medium: about 20–60 active picks per labor hour per operator, depending on travel and replenishment | Medium to high: about 40–100 active picks per labor hour per operator when SKU placement and batching are well controlled | These are planning ranges, not guaranteed rates; item size, order profile, walking distance, and scan procedures strongly affect actual performance. |
| Storage utilization | Lower when the opposite side of the aisle is unused or when racks are placed only along perimeter walls | Higher in compact modules because one rack structure serves two pick faces | Compare total module width, aisle width, replenishment access, and required fire or egress clearances—not rack depth alone. |
| Replenishment method | Replenishment and picking normally occur from the same face | Can support front picking with replenishment from the opposite side when the rack is configured for two-direction operation | Separate replenishment and picking paths can reduce interference during busy periods. |
| Best use case | Small operations, perimeter picking, low-volume SKUs, or layouts requiring simple expansion | High-volume piece picking, fast-moving SKU zones, and operations requiring many accessible pick faces | Choose the layout that matches SKU velocity and order-line concentration, not only the available floor area. |
| Expansion flexibility | Generally easier to extend along a wall or add separate runs | Efficient for planned modules, but changes may affect both pick faces and shared aisle traffic | Leave space for future lanes, end-of-aisle maneuvering, replenishment staging, and emergency access. |
| Key decision rule | Select when simplicity, wall utilization, or gradual growth is the priority | Select when high pick-face density and reduced travel per order line justify a wider shared aisle | Validate the design with a measured time study using actual SKU dimensions and order-line data. |