| 802.11ax support | WiFi 6 can operate on 2.4 GHz. | WiFi 6 can operate on 5 GHz. | WiFi 6E extends WiFi 6 operation into 6 GHz; device and regional support are required. | Confirm that both the interphone and access point support the band and WiFi generation you plan to use. An 802.11ax label alone does not guarantee 6 GHz support. |
| Typical propagation | Often provides better reach through walls than higher bands, but is commonly busier. | Often offers a useful balance of capacity and coverage. | Usually has less reach through walls than lower-frequency bands at comparable conditions. | Do not choose a band from frequency alone. Building materials, access-point placement, antenna design, interference, and client transmit power all affect coverage. |
| Channel width options | 20 MHz is a common choice; 40 MHz may be available but can increase interference and reduce channel reuse. | 20, 40, 80, and, where supported and permitted, 160 MHz. | 20, 40, 80, and, where supported and permitted, 160 MHz. | For dependable interphone service, start with 20 or 40 MHz where suitable. Wider channels can increase peak capacity but are not a substitute for good coverage. |
| 160 MHz considerations | Not a standard practical 160 MHz option for this band. | Uses a broad block of spectrum; channel availability and use may be affected by local rules and Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) requirements. | May be available on compatible WiFi 6E equipment, subject to regional spectrum rules and device support. | Use 160 MHz only when both endpoints support it and a site survey confirms a clean, usable channel. It may leave fewer channel choices and can be more vulnerable to interference across its wider span. |
| Channel planning | In regions using the common 2.4 GHz plan, 20 MHz channels 1, 6, and 11 are often selected to avoid overlap; permitted channels vary by country. | Available channels and DFS rules vary by country. Nearby networks and radar-detection requirements can affect channel selection. | Available channels and permitted power levels vary by country and device category. | Check local regulations and the access point’s channel plan. Avoid assuming the same channel set is legal or available everywhere. |
| Interference and congestion | Often shared with Bluetooth and many household devices, so congestion can be significant. | May be less congested than 2.4 GHz in some locations, but neighboring networks can still compete for airtime. | Can offer additional spectrum where supported, but availability and coverage depend on the local environment. | Scan the actual installation area. A clearer channel and well-placed access point matter more than selecting a band based only on its headline speed. |
| Coverage validation target | For voice-oriented WiFi planning, approximately −67 dBm or stronger received signal is a commonly used design target; it is not a guarantee of call quality. | Measure at the interphone’s installed position, including doorways and other weak spots. Also check signal quality, packet loss, roaming behavior, and call performance under load. |
| Access-point placement | Coverage depends on the complete radio path, not just the access point’s advertised range. | Place access points in open, central locations where practical. Test through the actual walls, floors, doors, and exterior materials between the access point and interphone. |
| Recommended selection approach | Consider when reach and compatibility are priorities and the band is not overly congested. | Consider for a balance of capacity and coverage when the interphone supports it. | Consider when both devices support WiFi 6E and measured coverage is sufficient. | Choose the band and channel width based on an on-site test. Favor stable coverage and reliable two-way audio over maximum theoretical throughput. |